The Nastassja Kinski-Roman Polanski Case: A News Explainer

The relationship between actress Nastassja Kinski and director Roman Polanski has once again resurfaced, sparking renewed debate about power dynamics, historical context, and the ongoing reckoning with sexual abuse in Hollywood. This explainer breaks down the key aspects of the controversy.

Who are Nastassja Kinski and Roman Polanski?

Nastassja Kinski is a German actress known for her roles in films like "Paris, Texas" and "Tess." Roman Polanski is a Polish-French film director celebrated for films like "Rosemary's Baby" and "Chinatown," but also infamous for his 1977 conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl, Samantha Geimer. He fled the United States before sentencing and has remained a fugitive ever since.

What is the controversy surrounding their relationship?

The controversy centers on Kinski's portrayal of her relationship with Polanski, particularly regarding her casting in the lead role of "Tess" (1979). In a 2018 interview with German newspaper *Die Zeit*, Kinski claimed that Polanski had a "respectful" and "protective" attitude towards her during the filming of “Tess,” and that their relationship did not become sexual until years later, after she had turned 16. However, critics and observers have questioned the power dynamics involved, given Polanski's history and the age difference between them. Further complicating the matter, Kinski's father, actor Klaus Kinski, was himself accused of sexually abusing his daughter, a claim she has supported. This adds another layer of complexity to the narrative surrounding her experiences.

When did this relationship occur?

Polanski cast Kinski in "Tess" in 1978, when she was 16 years old. Filming took place primarily in France and England. Kinski has stated that their sexual relationship began sometime after the filming of "Tess," although the exact timing remains ambiguous. The renewed scrutiny began in 2018 with Kinski's interview and has continued with subsequent discussions around Polanski's legacy and the #MeToo movement.

Where did the relationship take place?

While filming "Tess," Kinski was primarily on location in France and England. The subsequent relationship, according to Kinski, occurred after the filming concluded, but the specific locations have not been publicly disclosed.

Why is this relationship controversial?

The controversy stems from several factors:

• Polanski's History: His 1977 conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor casts a long shadow over any relationship he has with younger women. This makes it difficult to separate any interaction with a minor from the inherent power imbalance and potential for exploitation.


• Age Difference and Power Dynamics: Even if the sexual relationship began after Kinski turned 16 (the age of consent in many countries), the significant age difference between her and Polanski, coupled with his position of power as a director, raises concerns about coercion and manipulation.


• Kinski's Vulnerability: Given the allegations of abuse against her father, some observers argue that Kinski may have been particularly vulnerable to manipulation or exploitation.


• #MeToo Movement: The renewed scrutiny of Polanski and Kinski's relationship is happening within the context of the #MeToo movement, which has empowered survivors of sexual abuse to come forward and has forced a re-evaluation of power dynamics in Hollywood and beyond.

Historical Context:

The relationship between Polanski and Kinski must be understood within the context of the late 1970s. The era was characterized by a different understanding of power dynamics and consent, particularly in the entertainment industry. While Polanski's crime was widely reported, the full implications of his actions and the broader issues of sexual abuse and exploitation were not as widely understood or discussed as they are today. Furthermore, the film industry in that era often operated with a level of impunity, where powerful figures could exploit their positions with little fear of repercussions.

Current Developments:

The recent interest in the Polanski-Kinski relationship is fueled by the ongoing re-evaluation of historical abuses in Hollywood. Kinski's own statements have been met with skepticism and criticism. Some critics argue that she is minimizing the potential for exploitation in her relationship with Polanski, while others defend her right to tell her own story.

Recently, the 2019 film "An Officer and a Spy" by Polanski ignited protests and boycotts, showcasing the ongoing controversy surrounding his work. This film, which focuses on the Dreyfus affair and perceived injustice, has been interpreted by some as a veiled attempt by Polanski to present himself as a victim of persecution. This has further amplified the scrutiny of his past and the ethical questions surrounding his continued presence in the film industry.

Likely Next Steps:

The controversy surrounding the Polanski-Kinski relationship is likely to continue as long as Polanski remains a public figure. Possible next steps include:

• Continued Public Discourse: The discussion about power dynamics, consent, and the responsibility of the entertainment industry will likely continue, fueled by Kinski's statements and Polanski's ongoing career.


• Re-evaluation of Polanski's Work: Film critics and scholars may continue to re-examine Polanski's films through the lens of his personal history, exploring how his actions may have influenced his artistic choices.


• Advocacy for Survivors: The renewed attention to this case may inspire further advocacy for survivors of sexual abuse and exploitation, pushing for greater accountability and systemic change within the entertainment industry.


• Possible Legal Action (Unlikely): While unlikely given the passage of time, there is always a possibility of further legal scrutiny, particularly if new evidence emerges. However, statute of limitations issues and the complexities of international law make this a remote possibility.

Ultimately, the Nastassja Kinski-Roman Polanski case serves as a stark reminder of the complex and often troubling power dynamics that have shaped Hollywood for decades. It highlights the need for continued vigilance and a commitment to creating a safer and more equitable environment for all. The case also underscores the lasting impact of historical abuses and the challenges of reconciling artistic achievement with personal misconduct.